FAQs
- Safe streets: redesigning streets to reduce conflict between road users
- Safe vehicles: allowing only the safest vehicles to use our roads
- Safe behaviours: engaging and educating people about travelling safely and enforcing against those that continue to put other at risk
- Post collision learning and justice: learning from collisions and better supporting the people who have been involved
- The more likely a collision will occur, because the driver has less time to react, stop and avoid a collision
- The more severe any injury resulting from a collision will be
- Installing new speed limit signs and road markings
- Recalibrating all existing speed cameras to enforce the new lower speed limit
- Regular speed limit signs are installed at the entrance to roads indicating the speed limit, as well as repeater signs along the road. These are standard measures when indicating speed limits and in with DfT guidance
- Raised pedestrian crossing points
- Speed tables
- Lane reallocation (cycle lanes, bus lanes, footway extensions)
- Lamp column mounted banners
- Planting and green infrastructure changes
The more likely a collision will occur because the driver has less time to react, stop or avoid the collision
The more severe an injury resulting from the collision will be
Vehicle speeds on 20mph main through roads fell by an average of 3.8mph.
54.0% of vehicles were being driven at or below 24mph, compared to 20.8% before implementation. These reductions are expected to lower risk of collisions and the severity of resulting injuries.
Although considered too early to meaningfully assess trends in pedestrian and cyclist casualties, there was a decrease in overall road casualties, which fell by 11.8% in the four quarters after implementation of the policy.
Do slower speeds cause congestion and pollution?
Imperial College London's research into the impact of 20mph speed limits suggests they have no net negative impact on exhaust emissions. Results indicated clear benefits to driving style and associated particulate emissions. The research found that vehicles moved more smoothly, with fewer accelerations and decelerations, than in 30mph zones, reducing particulate emissions from tyre and brake wear. We have undertaken an Environmental Evaluation and are satisfied that the lowering of speeds will not have an adverse impact on the environment or air quality. The Environmental Evaluation recommendation was that no air quality modelling was therefore required.
Will journey times including those for buses increase and will this lead to inconvenience and extra cost for businesses?
Due to current average speeds, it is unlikely that the lowering of speed limits from 30mph to 20mph will change existing journey times during the day. During off-peak periods, including overnight, some people may experience a slight increase in journey times, however research into the impacts of 20mph by Steer Davies Gleave suggests that introducing 20mph speed limits has a negligible impact on journey times, given that overall journey times are largely dictated by junction delays and not vehicle speeds. We do not expect any changes to be made to bus timetables during the day as a result of the programme. Given the negligible end-to-end journey time impact of the speed limit reduction it is unlikely we will need to make changes to night bus timetables. However we will continue to monitor bus reliability to determine if changes to timetables are needed.
Will the self-enforcing measures not slow traffic, be uncomfortable for passengers and lead to more vehicle wear?
Alongside the self-enforcing measures we are using a mix of other measures to slow speeds, including recalibrating the speed cameras to enforce the 20mph limit, deploying additional traffic enforcement officers on site, and educating drivers on the dangers of speeding. Following monitoring, we will introduce further measures to reduce speeds if needed. There is no evidence to suggest that vehicles are damaged if they approach and pass over speed cushions at an appropriate speed.
Are more physical measures needed including more crossings and segregated cycle lanes?
To introduce safer speeds on our roads as quickly and consistently as possible, we will be lowering the speed limit with signs and lining changes only at first. A comprehensive monitoring and evaluation strategy has been developed which will assess the efficiency of the programme in lowering speeds. We will use this assessment to decide whether more traffic calming measures are needed and where they should be introduced on other parts of the road network. This will allow us to direct limited resources to the areas of the network where road danger risk is highest.
The physical measures included in the proposals already have been included at locations where speeds are higher than average and there is a higher than average number of collisions resulting in people being killed or seriously injured. The measures, including raised pedestrian crossings, are designed to allow motor vehicles to travel over them safely, and without having to slow down, if driving at a 20mph speed limit.
Is better enforcement needed for better road user behaviour?
Enforcement plays a fundamental role in helping to deliver compliance with speed limits. The Police enforce all speed limits in London, including 20mph speed limits. To support the roll out of 20mph and to achieve the Mayor’s Vision Zero ambition we’re working with them to enhance this activity with better targeting, new technology, enhanced powers and additional staff which will increase the deterrent effect and reduce the number of people who choose to break the law and put others at risk. TfL and the Metropolitan Police will continue to offer Community Roadwatch across London allowing members of the public to work with the Police to undertake speed enforcement in their local areas. Existing spot speed cameras are in operation on the road network in central London and these will be recalibrated to enforce 20mph speed limits and new cameras will be installed. Our new road danger reduction approach is based on the internationally recognised Safe System. A core principle of this approach is accepting that people will always make mistakes and designing a transport system that ensures death and serious injury does not occur on the transport network when people do. Our work to deliver a Safe System for everyone travelling in London focuses on:
Safe speeds: lowering speeds to reduce the likelihood and severity of collisions
We are delivering marketing, enforcement, training and education campaigns to change behaviours and ensure everyone who uses the road network – people driving, riding or walking – is behaving safely. While speed limits only apply to motor vehicles under the Highway Code, we expect cyclists to travel safely and acknowledge the lower speed limits. Of the speed-related collisions on London’s streets almost all involve motor vehicles and not bicycles. Cyclists behaving in a way that endangers other roads users can be charged with offencesThe Police can and do enforce dangerous cycling on London’s streets.
The MPS will designate police constable traffic enforcement powers to police community support officers so they can stop speeding vehicles and take enforcement action against drivers.
Is it just to raise revenue?
TfL does not receive any money from fines issued to people for speeding. This money goes directly to central Government.
Will it lead to more collisions?
There is no evidence to suggest that travelling at 20mph will increase collisions or impact driver concentration. Collision data from around the world is very clear – lower speeds save lives. Research shows that the faster a vehicle is travelling:
A speed limit of 20mph has been determined as a safer speed limit for many roads in London because of the high number of people walking and cycling. If a person walking is hit by a vehicle travelling at 30mph they are almost five times more likely to be killed than if they were hit at 20mph.
Current collision monitoring from phase 1 of the lowering speed limits programme shows over 125 fewer collisions occurred in central London since the 20mph speed limit was introduced. No fatalities or serious injuries have occurred on these roads since the 20mph speed limit was installed. Collisions involving those walking, cycling or using a motorcycle have decreased by almost a half.
Do we need consistency in speed limits?
We work closely with the London Boroughs to create consistent speeds across the both the borough road and TfL road networks. Over half of all London roads already have a 20mph speed limit and we are continuing to work with the London boroughs where 20mph is not implemented already.
How will you deliver lower speed limits?
Department for Transport (DfT) guidance suggests that streets that are self-enforcing are the most successful way to achieve compliance with lower speed limits. In addition, the look and feel of roads that are designed to be self-enforcing often mean they’re more welcoming places for people to walk and cycle.
However, the roads we manage are London's most strategic routes, carrying 30% of all London’s traffic and providing important links for freight and servicing vehicles, as well as buses. They’re also often relied upon by emergency services as the most direct roads to use when responding to an emergency.
There's no 'one size fits all' approach to reducing vehicle speeds and we also need to consider the type and function of the road, the space available and different road users, when we design a low speed environment.
The Mayor is keen for TfL to deliver the benefits of a lower speed limit as soon as possible. Therefore, in the first instance, our work will involve:
Work involves:
The Police will continue enforcing all speed limits across London, including where new speed limits are in place. The Police enforce all speed limits in London using on-street officers, mobile speed cameras and fixed speed cameras.
We will be closely monitoring the effects of these schemes on vehicle speeds thorough a variety of methods such as speed surveys and Healthy Streets environmental surveys.
The introduction of the lower speed limits will be supported by a marketing campaign to increase awareness of the new limits. This will be before the new speed limits are introduced.
Once the speed limit has been reduced and we have monitored and assessed the effectiveness of the speed limit change, we will seek to introduce further measures where appropriate which may include:
How will TfL ensure that the new speed limits are enforced?
Enforcement plays a fundamental role in helping to deliver compliance with speed limits. The Police enforce all speed limits. In London, enforcement is carried out by the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) and the City of London Police (CoLP).
The new speed limits introduced through Phase 3 of the Lowering Speed Limits programme will be delivered initially through a signs and lines approach and raising awareness of the new speed limit. Any existing safety cameras will be recalibrated to reflect the new speed limit.
We will also follow a robust speed and collision monitoring strategy post-implementation. Through this, this will help us to identify locations where additional physical measures may be required to support a self-enforcing speed limit. For example, traffic calming measures and vehicle-activated signs.
Lowering speed limits is effective in reducing the number of people killed or seriously injured with this current strategy. Post implementation monitoring of the Lowering Speed Limits programme in central London has shown that it has been effective in reducing the number of collisions by 25 per cent (from 405 to 304) and the number of collisions resulting in death or serious injury by 24 per cent (from 94 to 71).
We provide funding for camera and on-street speed enforcement carried out by the MPS. We’re working with the MPS to enhance this activity with better targeting, new technology, enhanced powers and additional staff. This will increase the deterrent effect and reduce the number of people who choose to break the law and put others at risk. In 2024/25 the MPS enforced over 344,000 speeding offences in 20mph zones.
There are a number of enforcement interventions which include spot speed cameras, average speed cameras and mobile enforcement cameras and speed enforcement operations held by the MPS.
Our policing partners always find first hand intelligence useful. Speeding offences can be tricky as the police have to witness it to enforce it and when the police are onsite, people are more likely to be compliant. Motorists or witnesses should report any criminal issues to the police via the Metropolitan Police website, or by visiting a police station. As much evidence and detail as possible should be provided as this could help lead to a successful prosecution. The police will also use this data to build on intelligence and inform tasking and deployment of police officers.
TfL and the Metropolitan Police also offer Community Roadwatch across London allowing members of the public to work with the Police to undertake speed enforcement in their local areas.
What evidence do we have that lowering speed limits has worked elsewhere and has worked since implementation?
Collision data from around the world is very clear. It shows that the faster a vehicle is travelling:
Speed is a factor in about half of all fatal collisions in London.
A speed limit of 20mph has been determined as a safer speed limit for many roads in London because of the high number of people walking and cycling. If a person walking is hit by a vehicle travelling at 30mph they are almost five times more likely to be killed than if they were hit at 20mph.
The road safety charity Brake found that for every 1mph speed reduction in an urban area, there is a 6% reduction in collisions.
Evidence from London
TfL has recently published an analysis of more than 150 20mph schemes implemented by London boroughs between 1989 and 2013. This showed that 40% fewer people were killed on these roads (against a background trend of 7% fewer fatalities on other roads without 20mph speed limits), 34% fewer people were killed or seriously injured (against a background trend of 15% fewer casualties) and 35% fewer collisions occurred (against a background trend of 12% fewer collisions). The analysis can be found on our Safe Speeds webpage, under ‘Learning from collision data’. On this page, you can also read the latest research about the benefits of lower speeds.
Collision monitoring data collected from 1 May 2020 to 30 June 2022, after Phase 1 of Lowering Speed Limits, were compared to a similarly seasonally-matched period before 20mph speed limits were introduced in the central London Congestion Charging Zone in 2020. The number of collisions fell 25% (from 405 to 304), and collisions resulting in death or serious injury fell 24% (from 94 to 71). The London-wide reduction in collisions resulting in death or serious injury fell around 10% in the same period.
Evidence from Wales
Wales was one of the first countries in the world, to introduce a 20mph speed limit on restricted roads nationally (usually in residential and built-up areas).
In July 2025, Wales published data on the effects of the 20mph default speed limit, covering the 18 months following policy implementation in September 2023. This showed:
Evidence from Helsinki and Oslo
Both Helsinki and Oslo have achieved great success towards Vision Zero. From July 2024 to July 2025, Helsinki reported zero road fatalities. This success was achieved, in part, through lowering speed limits to 19mph on almost all roads. In Oslo, there were no reported casualties while walking or cycling in 2023. Once again, lowering speed limits contributed to this achievement. Find out more about Vision Zero in Helsinki and Oslo on our Vision Zero for London webpage, under ‘International case studies’.
How have the roads been selected for the Lowering Speed Limits programme?
Transport for London are directly responsible for the Transport for London Road Network, which makes up 5% of London’s roads, carries one third of traffic and is where 26% of all collisions and 35% of all fatalities occurred between 2022 and 2024. We completed a risk-based analysis to identify locations where there is a case to lower speed limits on this road network. This analysis considered:
• Current road danger (including numbers of fatal and serious collisions)
• Current and potential levels of walking and cycling
• Surrounding borough speed limits
• The function of the road, including whether it is a town centre
• The need to avoid displacing traffic from the Transport for London Road Network to local streets
As part of this analysis, segments of the Transport for London Road Network were scored for road danger, based on the risk of death or serious injury per kilometre travelled by mode, the exposure level of road users, and the likely scope for collision reduction.
The locations selected for Phase 3 of the Lowering Speed Limits programme focused on those with the highest casualty harm and where we could ensure consistent speed limits.
Please do take a look at our road danger reduction dashboard to find out more about the collisions happening on our streets.
Would educating pedestrians and cyclists be more effective than lowering speed limits to prevent fatal and serious casualties?
We are delivering marketing, enforcement, training and education campaigns to change behaviours and ensure everyone who uses the road network – people driving, riding or walking – is behaving safely.
While speed limits only apply to motor vehicles under the Highway Code, we expect cyclists to travel safely and acknowledge the lower speed limits. Of the speed-related collisions on London’s streets, almost all involve motor vehicles and not bicycles. Cyclists that are behaving in a way that endangers other road users can be charged with offences. The Police can and do enforce against dangerous cycling on London’s streets.
We also offer safety training through our road safety programmes.
However, we take the safe system approach which is based around the principle that human errors are expected and will happen. It focuses on designing infrastructure and introducing policy to prevent fatal collisions rather than react to them. It’s based around five main pillars: safe speeds, safe streets, safe vehicles, safe behaviours, and post-collision response.
People make mistakes but shouldn’t pay with their lives. Lowering speeds is part of that approach, to help prevent death or serious injury from occurring.

