Bus routes 67 and 149 - proposed changes

Share Bus routes 67 and 149 - proposed changes on Facebook Share Bus routes 67 and 149 - proposed changes on X (formerly Twitter) Share Bus routes 67 and 149 - proposed changes on Linkedin Email Bus routes 67 and 149 - proposed changes link
We are seeking views on the proposed changes to bus routes 67 and 149 to simplify the network and better match services to passenger demand in north and central London


We’re proposing changes to bus routes 67 and 149. Use the following buttons to find out more about the proposals, how they may impact you, and how you can have your say.

You have until Sunday 20 September 2026 to give us your feedback.

Proposal

Route 149 bus

We are proposing to change the routeing of bus route 149 and to withdraw route 67.

The northern terminus of route 149 would change from Edmonton Green to Wood Green. It would still terminate as it does now at London Bridge at its southern end.

If the changes were to be introduced, subject to the outcome of consultation, the frequency of route 149 would also change.

On bus route 149 (Wood Green - London Bridge), we would:

  • Decrease the weekday peak frequencies from a bus every seven minutes to a bus every eight minutes

  • This would represent a frequency increase on the section currently covered by route 67 (Wood Green to Stamford Hill) and a frequency decrease for the section between Stamford Hill and London Bridge

Frequency changes are not within the scope of consultation. They form part of our continual review of the bus network which helps ensure services operate more efficiently with the right level of service provided.

Below is a map showing the proposals for routes 67 and 149. The map also shows route 243 and revised route 279 which would not change but would retain connections currently provided by route 149.

Route 149 proposed restructure

Current Route: Operates between Edmonton Green and London Bridge

Proposed Route: Re-structured to run between Wood Green and London Bridge on the current 67 routeing between Wood Green and Stamford Hill and on the existing 149 routeing between Stamford Hill and London Bridge.

This would introduce new direct links on route 149 between Wood Green and London Bridge, providing new direct access between areas in Haringey, such as West Green Road and St. Ann’s Road and areas in Hackney and the City of London, such as Hoxton, Shoreditch, Bishopsgate and Liverpool Street Station. It would also reduce duplication with other services on Tottenham High Road and Fore Street.

Passengers who currently travel on route 149 may lose direct links to some destinations. For example, people who travel between Edmonton Green and London Bridge would need to change between buses in future.

Routes 243 (Wood Green - Waterloo) and 279 (Waltham Cross - Stamford Hill) would not change as part of these proposals and would retain existing route 149 connections between Bruce Grove and Shoreditch (on route 243) and between Edmonton Green and Stamford Hill (on route 279).

The night service on route 149 would not change as part of these proposals and would continue to run between Edmonton Green and London Bridge on all nights of the week. It would be re-numbered as route N149.


Route 67 proposed withdrawal

Current Route: Operates between Wood Green and Dalston Junction

Proposal: Withdraw the route entirely.

Route 67 would be withdrawn and replaced with route 149. The new routeing of the 149 would retain all connections currently provided by route 67 between Wood Green and Dalston Junction with the exception of Stop N in Dalston Junction Bus Station. Passengers would be able to use Stop C on Kingsland Road instead.

The new routeing of the 149 would provide new direct links between areas such as Wood Green and St Ann’s Road and locations such as Hoxton, Shoreditch, Liverpool Street Station and London Bridge.

The map below shows the proposed changes.


Return to the top of the page
We are seeking views on the proposed changes to bus routes 67 and 149 to simplify the network and better match services to passenger demand in north and central London


We’re proposing changes to bus routes 67 and 149. Use the following buttons to find out more about the proposals, how they may impact you, and how you can have your say.

You have until Sunday 20 September 2026 to give us your feedback.

Proposal

Route 149 bus

We are proposing to change the routeing of bus route 149 and to withdraw route 67.

The northern terminus of route 149 would change from Edmonton Green to Wood Green. It would still terminate as it does now at London Bridge at its southern end.

If the changes were to be introduced, subject to the outcome of consultation, the frequency of route 149 would also change.

On bus route 149 (Wood Green - London Bridge), we would:

  • Decrease the weekday peak frequencies from a bus every seven minutes to a bus every eight minutes

  • This would represent a frequency increase on the section currently covered by route 67 (Wood Green to Stamford Hill) and a frequency decrease for the section between Stamford Hill and London Bridge

Frequency changes are not within the scope of consultation. They form part of our continual review of the bus network which helps ensure services operate more efficiently with the right level of service provided.

Below is a map showing the proposals for routes 67 and 149. The map also shows route 243 and revised route 279 which would not change but would retain connections currently provided by route 149.

Route 149 proposed restructure

Current Route: Operates between Edmonton Green and London Bridge

Proposed Route: Re-structured to run between Wood Green and London Bridge on the current 67 routeing between Wood Green and Stamford Hill and on the existing 149 routeing between Stamford Hill and London Bridge.

This would introduce new direct links on route 149 between Wood Green and London Bridge, providing new direct access between areas in Haringey, such as West Green Road and St. Ann’s Road and areas in Hackney and the City of London, such as Hoxton, Shoreditch, Bishopsgate and Liverpool Street Station. It would also reduce duplication with other services on Tottenham High Road and Fore Street.

Passengers who currently travel on route 149 may lose direct links to some destinations. For example, people who travel between Edmonton Green and London Bridge would need to change between buses in future.

Routes 243 (Wood Green - Waterloo) and 279 (Waltham Cross - Stamford Hill) would not change as part of these proposals and would retain existing route 149 connections between Bruce Grove and Shoreditch (on route 243) and between Edmonton Green and Stamford Hill (on route 279).

The night service on route 149 would not change as part of these proposals and would continue to run between Edmonton Green and London Bridge on all nights of the week. It would be re-numbered as route N149.


Route 67 proposed withdrawal

Current Route: Operates between Wood Green and Dalston Junction

Proposal: Withdraw the route entirely.

Route 67 would be withdrawn and replaced with route 149. The new routeing of the 149 would retain all connections currently provided by route 67 between Wood Green and Dalston Junction with the exception of Stop N in Dalston Junction Bus Station. Passengers would be able to use Stop C on Kingsland Road instead.

The new routeing of the 149 would provide new direct links between areas such as Wood Green and St Ann’s Road and locations such as Hoxton, Shoreditch, Liverpool Street Station and London Bridge.

The map below shows the proposed changes.


Return to the top of the page

Ask us a question

If you have any questions about the scheme, you can ask us here and we will get back to you.

Please note that any questions you ask may be visible to others and will be subject to moderation. Any personal information will be kept confidential but your user name will be displayed. Further details on moderation are available here and privacy here.

Email
loader image
Didn't receive confirmation?
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • Share Why are you cutting a busy route like this but not routes like 357? Every time I have seen that route it's just empty, even during peak times. Useless. 215 would provide sufficient capacity along that corridor if it were to get extended to Whipps Cross. The 149's Stamford Hill - Edmonton Green section one way for sure is far busier than 357 as a whole. Why do you keep targeting Hackney? Every proposal that has many negative responses has been followed though with anyway? on Facebook Share Why are you cutting a busy route like this but not routes like 357? Every time I have seen that route it's just empty, even during peak times. Useless. 215 would provide sufficient capacity along that corridor if it were to get extended to Whipps Cross. The 149's Stamford Hill - Edmonton Green section one way for sure is far busier than 357 as a whole. Why do you keep targeting Hackney? Every proposal that has many negative responses has been followed though with anyway? on X (formerly Twitter) Share Why are you cutting a busy route like this but not routes like 357? Every time I have seen that route it's just empty, even during peak times. Useless. 215 would provide sufficient capacity along that corridor if it were to get extended to Whipps Cross. The 149's Stamford Hill - Edmonton Green section one way for sure is far busier than 357 as a whole. Why do you keep targeting Hackney? Every proposal that has many negative responses has been followed though with anyway? on Linkedin Email Why are you cutting a busy route like this but not routes like 357? Every time I have seen that route it's just empty, even during peak times. Useless. 215 would provide sufficient capacity along that corridor if it were to get extended to Whipps Cross. The 149's Stamford Hill - Edmonton Green section one way for sure is far busier than 357 as a whole. Why do you keep targeting Hackney? Every proposal that has many negative responses has been followed though with anyway? link

    Why are you cutting a busy route like this but not routes like 357? Every time I have seen that route it's just empty, even during peak times. Useless. 215 would provide sufficient capacity along that corridor if it were to get extended to Whipps Cross. The 149's Stamford Hill - Edmonton Green section one way for sure is far busier than 357 as a whole. Why do you keep targeting Hackney? Every proposal that has many negative responses has been followed though with anyway?

    didnp20 asked 5 days ago

    Good afternoon

    Thank you for your question. 

    We aim to operate a bus network that provides sufficient capacity for all passengers who wish to travel. Currently, there is surplus capacity provided by bus services on the A10 and A1010, with multiple bus routes providing a higher level of service than is required for current passenger demand. 

    If route 149 is re-structured to run to Wood Green instead of Edmonton Green, remaining bus routes would provide over 28 buses per hour at the busiest points on the A10 and A1010, with a bus scheduled to arrive every 2-3 minutes on average. We expect this to provide sufficient capacity with a very high frequency of service retained along the corridor. 

    If the proposed changes are introduced, the local bus network would continue to be monitored to help ensure that the right level of service is provided.

    Levels of service and connectivity of the wider London bus network also remain under continual review to help ensure that the network meets the needs of passengers.

    Kind regards

    TfL Consultation team

  • Share Why does another route need to be removed from Tottenham High Road? There will not be enough buses in the area on Facebook Share Why does another route need to be removed from Tottenham High Road? There will not be enough buses in the area on X (formerly Twitter) Share Why does another route need to be removed from Tottenham High Road? There will not be enough buses in the area on Linkedin Email Why does another route need to be removed from Tottenham High Road? There will not be enough buses in the area link

    Why does another route need to be removed from Tottenham High Road? There will not be enough buses in the area

    kexcvi asked 19 days ago

    Good afternoon,

    Thank you for your enquiry about the consultation concerning proposed changes to the 67 and 149 bus routes. 

    There is a higher level of bus service than required on the A10 and A1010, including Tottenham High Road. We are consulting on restructuring the route to ensure capacity meets demand on the network. We continually review the level of demand for bus services and are confident that the new changes would still provide sufficient capacity. The local network would continue to be monitored to help ensure that the right level of service is provided if the planned changes are introduced.

    Kind Regards

    TfL Consultation team

  • Share Why withdraw another bus route like the 67, this is not going to encourage people to use buses. Also rather than withdrawing Route 67, why cant you look into extending the 67 from Wood Green to New Southgate Betstyle Circus via Bounds Green following the 221? The 221 has been getting really busy over the years and its going to continue getting worse especially with housing develpment and the Crossrail 2 plans to New Southgate, which is also put on hold. on Facebook Share Why withdraw another bus route like the 67, this is not going to encourage people to use buses. Also rather than withdrawing Route 67, why cant you look into extending the 67 from Wood Green to New Southgate Betstyle Circus via Bounds Green following the 221? The 221 has been getting really busy over the years and its going to continue getting worse especially with housing develpment and the Crossrail 2 plans to New Southgate, which is also put on hold. on X (formerly Twitter) Share Why withdraw another bus route like the 67, this is not going to encourage people to use buses. Also rather than withdrawing Route 67, why cant you look into extending the 67 from Wood Green to New Southgate Betstyle Circus via Bounds Green following the 221? The 221 has been getting really busy over the years and its going to continue getting worse especially with housing develpment and the Crossrail 2 plans to New Southgate, which is also put on hold. on Linkedin Email Why withdraw another bus route like the 67, this is not going to encourage people to use buses. Also rather than withdrawing Route 67, why cant you look into extending the 67 from Wood Green to New Southgate Betstyle Circus via Bounds Green following the 221? The 221 has been getting really busy over the years and its going to continue getting worse especially with housing develpment and the Crossrail 2 plans to New Southgate, which is also put on hold. link

    Why withdraw another bus route like the 67, this is not going to encourage people to use buses. Also rather than withdrawing Route 67, why cant you look into extending the 67 from Wood Green to New Southgate Betstyle Circus via Bounds Green following the 221? The 221 has been getting really busy over the years and its going to continue getting worse especially with housing develpment and the Crossrail 2 plans to New Southgate, which is also put on hold.

    DBI asked about 2 months ago

    Good afternoon

    Thank you for your enquiry about the consultation concerning proposed changes to the 67 and 149 bus routes. 

    There is currently surplus capacity on bus routes operating on the A10 and A1010 'corridor' and making this proposed change would ensure that capacity better matches demand on the network. The 67 and 149 bus routes consultation proposes withdrawing route 67 and rerouting route 149 to Wood Green, this would see all bus stops currently served by the 67 route be served by the proposed changed 149 route.

    Extending the 67 route would not resolve the primary issue of surplus capacity currently operating on the bus network.

    Thank you for your thoughts about the 221 bus route and its level of usage. While the current consultation is only covers proposals to change routes 67 and 149, the wider network remains under continual review to help ensure that sufficient capacity is provided where it is required.

    Kind Regards

    TfL Consultation team

  • Share Will this affect travel to or from Bromley or Westminster ir Central London into Gravesend Kent or Dartford Kent? on Facebook Share Will this affect travel to or from Bromley or Westminster ir Central London into Gravesend Kent or Dartford Kent? on X (formerly Twitter) Share Will this affect travel to or from Bromley or Westminster ir Central London into Gravesend Kent or Dartford Kent? on Linkedin Email Will this affect travel to or from Bromley or Westminster ir Central London into Gravesend Kent or Dartford Kent? link

    Will this affect travel to or from Bromley or Westminster ir Central London into Gravesend Kent or Dartford Kent?

    BSinghaa asked 16 days ago

    Good afternoon

    Thank you for your question. 

    The proposed changes would not impact journeys between central London, including Westminster, and Bromley, Gravesend or Dartford.

    Kind regards 

    TfL Consultation team

  • Share Could please revive 349 at least, restore the 259 back as well as the 279. I don't think it is fair people pleaded not to proceed with those changes but you ignored us. Because a lot of passengers that use these buses use them as school students or connections to areas that cannot afford the train. Do you value this? on Facebook Share Could please revive 349 at least, restore the 259 back as well as the 279. I don't think it is fair people pleaded not to proceed with those changes but you ignored us. Because a lot of passengers that use these buses use them as school students or connections to areas that cannot afford the train. Do you value this? on X (formerly Twitter) Share Could please revive 349 at least, restore the 259 back as well as the 279. I don't think it is fair people pleaded not to proceed with those changes but you ignored us. Because a lot of passengers that use these buses use them as school students or connections to areas that cannot afford the train. Do you value this? on Linkedin Email Could please revive 349 at least, restore the 259 back as well as the 279. I don't think it is fair people pleaded not to proceed with those changes but you ignored us. Because a lot of passengers that use these buses use them as school students or connections to areas that cannot afford the train. Do you value this? link

    Could please revive 349 at least, restore the 259 back as well as the 279. I don't think it is fair people pleaded not to proceed with those changes but you ignored us. Because a lot of passengers that use these buses use them as school students or connections to areas that cannot afford the train. Do you value this?

    Camberry asked about 2 months ago

    Good morning

    Thank you for your questions. 

    Your questions relate to a separate consultation that covered proposed changes to bus routes 259, 279 and 349, this consultation was open for responses until 23 January 2026 and the consultation report was published on 26 June 2026. In this, we confirmed our decision to proceed with changes to routes 259, 279 and 349, this did included withdrawing route 349 and changing routes 259 and 279 to better match services to current travel demand. The consultation report can be viewed along with latest updates on the webpages https://haveyoursay.tfl.gov.uk/routes-259-279-349.

    When developing consultations, we follow best practice guidelines to ensure our activities are legally compliant, open, and honest. Through consultation, we seek to obtain feedback from respondents and to understand the reasons why they may view proposals positively or negatively.  

    Through this feedback, a range of concerns were raised in response to the consultation which we have considered carefully. It’s important to note that a consultation is not a referendum or a vote. Its purpose is to gather feedback and views from those impacted by our proposals to assist our decision-making process. A consultation doesn’t simply present a binary vote of support or opposition, rather it provides the detail as to why people may support or oppose a proposal. This detail assists us in determining how we can respond to these concerns and potentially mitigate them.

    We have made some changes to the proposals following feedback gathered from the consultation process; Rather than terminating on Camden Road, route 259 will continue to the northern end of Caledonian Road, serving Stop V. This change will allow same-stop interchange for southbound passengers between route 259 and routes 17 and 91, making onward journeys easier and more intuitive. In the northbound direction, route 259 will also serve stops E, F and G on Hillmarton Road, helping to maintain access to this area and ensuring that local connections remain strong and reliable. Together, these improvements are designed to respond to concerns raise during the consultation and make journeys smoother, more joined-up, and easier to navigate for everyone using the network. We will also provide increased frequency on the 259 route in the early morning period to make journeys easier.

    Customers will also be able to use the hopper fare to interchange at the stop locations mentioned above, with school students having access to Oyster zip photocards.

    Kind regards

    TfL consultation team

  • Share What about the midnight workers who take the 149. The N279 comes at a different time and aside that there’s no other bus that takes the route from Edmonton through to London Bridge. Is there any provision available for us? on Facebook Share What about the midnight workers who take the 149. The N279 comes at a different time and aside that there’s no other bus that takes the route from Edmonton through to London Bridge. Is there any provision available for us? on X (formerly Twitter) Share What about the midnight workers who take the 149. The N279 comes at a different time and aside that there’s no other bus that takes the route from Edmonton through to London Bridge. Is there any provision available for us? on Linkedin Email What about the midnight workers who take the 149. The N279 comes at a different time and aside that there’s no other bus that takes the route from Edmonton through to London Bridge. Is there any provision available for us? link

    What about the midnight workers who take the 149. The N279 comes at a different time and aside that there’s no other bus that takes the route from Edmonton through to London Bridge. Is there any provision available for us?

    Vvy asked about 1 month ago

    Hello

    Thank you for your question. 

    The night service on route 149 would not change as part of these proposals and would continue to run between Edmonton Green and London Bridge on all nights of the week. It would be re-numbered as route N149. 

    Kind regards

    TfL Consultation team

  • Share What is the route of the N149 and what times will it operate? What does this mean for people on the current 67 route? If the N149 sticks to the current route, people on the 67 route between Wood Green and through La Rose Lane will lose a night time service. Is that correct? on Facebook Share What is the route of the N149 and what times will it operate? What does this mean for people on the current 67 route? If the N149 sticks to the current route, people on the 67 route between Wood Green and through La Rose Lane will lose a night time service. Is that correct? on X (formerly Twitter) Share What is the route of the N149 and what times will it operate? What does this mean for people on the current 67 route? If the N149 sticks to the current route, people on the 67 route between Wood Green and through La Rose Lane will lose a night time service. Is that correct? on Linkedin Email What is the route of the N149 and what times will it operate? What does this mean for people on the current 67 route? If the N149 sticks to the current route, people on the 67 route between Wood Green and through La Rose Lane will lose a night time service. Is that correct? link

    What is the route of the N149 and what times will it operate? What does this mean for people on the current 67 route? If the N149 sticks to the current route, people on the 67 route between Wood Green and through La Rose Lane will lose a night time service. Is that correct?

    SIBO asked about 1 month ago

    Good Morning

    Thank you for your question. 

    We can confirm the route of the proposed N149 is the same as the existing 149 route – please see consultation materials for full details.  There are also no plans to alter bus route 243 which operates a 24-hour service between Wood Green and Waterloo through Tottenham High Road.

    Kind Regards 

    TfL Consultation Team

Page last updated: 12 Aug 2026, 09:37 AM